Artix Linux Forum

Hi guys!  :)

I was wondering which type of network manager you use? I personally use IWD because it's lightweight, it's got the built-in DHCP client and it simply does the job. I also have iwgtk (https://github.com/J-Lentz/iwgtk) installed as my gui.

I'm curious  about your opinions on this.

I use Connman since it's the most minimal network manager with handy Bluetooth internet support and built-in DNS cacher. Equivalent to NM and DNSmasq for my use yet using less memory than both combined.

(Though, I'm open to setnet-like scripts if they can deal with Bluetooth).

I switched to iwd a while back from wpa_supplicant + dhcpcd and I'm satisfied. Never required anything more.

For my laptop, which uses WiFi, I'm using wpa_supplicant. It's more lightweight than any other wireless tool. I'm using dhcpcd as a DHCP client.

For my desktop, I'm using Ethernet cable connection, so there's no point in using network managers. I'm still using dhcpcd as a DHCP client, as I'm using ADSL connection.

See here: https://github.com/mayfrost/guides/blob/master/ALTERNATIVES.md#network-setup

For a TUI wpa_supplicant.conf generator, see SetNet (http://katolaz.net/setnet/).

Currently using connman on laptops. May switch to iwd in the future.

Still using NetworkManager atm, mainly since that's what I'm familiar with. I will *eventually* get around to trying things like wpa_supplicant and iwd when I'm not as busy. But for the moment NetworkManager satisifices.

Hello,
I have been using connman on laptops for two years and without any problems.

I use NetworkManager btw. It has handy plugins, e.g. for vpn.

NetworkManager, I want to get rid of everything from Red Hat but for working purposes NetworkManager works better for me. I haven't found the way to make some OpenVPNs configs to work in Connman.