Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Weird output labeling boot partition. (Read 589 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Weird output labeling boot partition.

I was running a normal Artix runit install following the wiki, UEFI laptop, with the latest weekly iso and I got this weird output after running "fatlabel /dev/sda1 BOOT".
"There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
This is mostly harmless. Differences: (offset:original/backup)
   65:01/00
   Not automatically fixing this."
/dev/sda1 is my boot partition formated as fat32, with 300M and mounted on /mnt/boot. I'll be continuing the installation normally either way.
I'm new to this forum so sorry if this isn't the right place for this report.

Re: Weird output labeling boot partition.

Reply #1 –
pretty sure that uefi partition should not be mounted as /mnt/boot.  /mnt/boot is for legacy boot esp if you use btrfs or f2fs or if you use gpt partition scheme and set a partition as bios_grub.

Anyway that is not the proper mount point for uefi.  you need to look at that again.

Code: [Select]
mkdir /mnt/boot/efi
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/boot/efi
Cat Herders of Linux
 

Re: Weird output labeling boot partition.

Reply #2 –
Quote from: Vannotz – on
I was running a normal Artix runit install following the wiki, UEFI laptop, with the latest weekly iso and I got this weird output after running "fatlabel /dev/sda1 BOOT".
"There are differences between boot sector and its backup.
This is mostly harmless. Differences: (offset:original/backup)
  65:01/00
  Not automatically fixing this."
/dev/sda1 is my boot partition formated as fat32, with 300M and mounted on /mnt/boot. I'll be continuing the installation normally either way.
I'm new to this forum so sorry if this isn't the right place for this report.

1- you shouldn't mount your EFI boot partition at /mnt/boot, mount it either at /efi or /boot/efi.

2- why are you using fatlabel?  from what I know, you just have to set your partition type to "EFI System Partition", fatlabel is not needed for UEFI boot.

3- This would belong to the System board[1], not general discussions about Artix.