Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic solved
This topic has been marked as solved and requires no further attention.
Topic: Artix package index seemingly out of date (Read 519 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Artix package index seemingly out of date

Hi, I've been looking for plasma-workspace package in the packages web site of artix and the latest one it showed me was about 5.27, I've googled a couple of times again and looking further into the packages list, every package is listed till till 2022. Why hasn't the index been updated? Also I think I could have sworn I saw 6.0.4 of plasma on there a couple of times although it could been my imagination?

Re: Artix package index seemingly out of date

Reply #1 –
Quote from: Erwin Iosef – on
I think I could have sworn I saw 6.0.4 of plasma on there a couple of times although it could been my imagination?

Hello,
You weren't dreaming, plasma-workspace is available in version 6.0.5-1:

Code: [Select]
pacman -Ss plasma-workspace
world/plasma-workspace 6.0.5.1-1 (plasma)
    KDE Plasma Workspace
world/plasma-workspace-wallpapers 6.0.5-1 (plasma)
    Additional wallpapers for the Plasma Workspace

Re: Artix package index seemingly out of date

Reply #2 –
I'm not entirely sure why packages.artixlinux.org gets left advertised on the front page as it's not working (or at least not up to date) and causes understandable confusion ? 
The best you can do is use gitea.artixlinux.org to get information from the build files.
 
 

Re: Artix package index seemingly out of date

Reply #3 –
@tintin  I know it's there on repository and I've updated days ago. I was talking about 6.0.4 present on the website. But yeah it could confuse some other users @gripped.
gitea huh? Okay then. Thank you. Should I mark the topic as solved then?

Re: Artix package index seemingly out of date

Reply #5 –
I was previously confused about the packages link, but now I know to use gitea. I suppose some php adjustment is needed.

Re: Artix package index seemingly out of date

Reply #6 –
I see, thanks for the answers everyone, marking it as solved(if no no-one has any objections) even though the problem still exists, I hope artix's package website improves soon.