Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: Bad packaging for glibc? (Read 204 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Bad packaging for glibc?

I cannot run john the ripper with a command john --test --format=opencl. John the ripper dev suggests bad distro packaging.
john-git/AUR version: 1.9.0.Jumbo.1.r1815.g62763b773-1
glibc/system: 2.42+r17+gd7274d718e6f-1

Quote
Oh, are you saying this is the very first line appearing after you run john --test --format=opencl? If so, this suggests to me that there's a packaging issue in the distro, probably incompatible library versions/builds or the like.


Code: [Select]
john --test --format=opencl
[arous:32126] *** Process received signal ***
[arous:32126] Signal: Segmentation fault (11)
[arous:32126] Signal code: Address not mapped (1)
[arous:32126] Failing at address: (nil)
[arous:32126] [ 0] /usr/lib/libc.so.6(+0x3e240) [0x7f881083e240]
[arous:32126] *** End of error message ***
Segmentation fault         john --test --format=opencl

I get the same error with following commands:

Code: [Select]
ocl-icd-choose rusticl.icd john --test --format=opencl
ocl-icd-choose amdocl64.icd john --test --format=opencl

Code: [Select]
pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libc.so.6
/usr/lib/libc.so.6 is owned by glibc 2.42+r17+gd7274d718e6f-1
 

Re: Bad packaging for glibc?

Reply #1 –
I highly doubt there's anything wrong with glibc per se. Maybe an strace would provide a bit more information?