Skip to main content
Topic: Social media (Read 14386 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Social media

Reply #15
Telegram is anti-privacy as well. For instance, it requires phone number for registration, and all communication goes through their servers.


I would agree, it provides geolocation via the "mobile phone", accurately within few meters.
Hence, I myself don't do any "social media" which is in reality asocial, a cesspool destroying society.

Re: Social media

Reply #16
Not saying you're wrong, but compared to big tech social media spyware, TG offers an open source client which doesn't record your voice, turn on your front camera, analyze all your phone sensors, scan your files and shove ads in your face. Plus, you can register using a burner phone (even a public payphone will do) and use its own FOSS client - or others - from your linux system.
For the time being it's an almost acceptable solution for non-sensitive, casual group communication, allowing for very large (200K) groups - end-to-end encryption can be used but only in secret chats and voice/video calls. For more serious stuff, Wire (also open-source client) is the way to go. For critical stuff, Tox is flirting with the top.

Re: Social media

Reply #17
Not saying you're wrong, but compared to big tech social media spyware, TG offers an open source client which doesn't record your voice, turn on your front camera, analyze all your phone sensors, scan your files and shove ads in your face. Plus, you can register using a burner phone (even a public payphone will do) and use its own FOSS client - or others - from your linux system.
For the time being it's an almost acceptable solution for non-sensitive, casual group communication, allowing for very large (200K) groups - end-to-end encryption can be used but only in secret chats and voice/video calls. For more serious stuff, Wire (also open-source client) is the way to go. For critical stuff, Tox is flirting with the top.


Just a general trend nous, has "social media", you know the culprits, really improved society?
Its a tool of division and spying, destroying and disconnecting human beings from nature.
As we can see clear all around us, many people are totally disconnected and out of touch with nature.

Its pretty cool to be able to communicate with people all over earth, but I don't need "social media" for that.

The real issue is censorship and tyranny creeping in, and surely TG  or gab is basically just an attempt to keep communication open.
But, a general trend is very rudimentary and primitive language, much stuff there without any substance,  regardless the network.

 

Re: Social media

Reply #18
Not saying you're wrong, but compared to big tech social media spyware, TG offers an open source client which doesn't record your voice, turn on your front camera, analyze all your phone sensors, scan your files and shove ads in your face. Plus, you can register using a burner phone (even a public payphone will do) and use its own FOSS client - or others - from your linux system.
For the time being it's an almost acceptable solution for non-sensitive, casual group communication, allowing for very large (200K) groups - end-to-end encryption can be used but only in secret chats and voice/video calls. For more serious stuff, Wire (also open-source client) is the way to go. For critical stuff, Tox is flirting with the top.
That's true regarding TG client, but not the server. The server is closed source, and it supposedly stores all of your messages and encryption keys, thus your conversations via TG are not secure and can be accessed by a third party.

Re: Social media

Reply #19
Hey artoo, «δυοῖν κακοῖν, τὸ μὴ χεῖρον βέλτιστον» (== between two evils, the lesser one is best). For reaching large groups of people without bigtech's boot on your neck, telegram is the lesser of two evils.

That's true regarding TG client, but not the server. The server is closed source, and it supposedly stores all of your messages and encryption keys, thus your conversations via TG are not secure and can be accessed by a third party.
Your information is wrong. The secret chats are end-to-end encrypted and only you and the recipient have the decryption keys (this is the definition of end-to-end). The client being open source, we are guaranteed that the keys aren't "accidentally" leaked to someone else. There are many IM clients out there boasting end-to-end encryption but are closed source - which means they're not to be trusted. At all.

Big flashing warning: don't ever use the TG client from google playstore, it contains code that allows Google to block channels and messages. Perhaps more. That being said, don't use Gboard or any closed source keyboard for that matter, as EVERYTHING you type is collected and uploaded.


Re: Social media

Reply #20
Hey artoo, «δυοῖν κακοῖν, τὸ μὴ χεῖρον βέλτιστον» (== between two evils, the lesser one is best). For reaching large groups of people without bigtech's boot on your neck, telegram is the lesser of two evils.
Your information is wrong. The secret chats are end-to-end encrypted and only you and the recipient have the decryption keys (this is the definition of end-to-end). The client being open source, we are guaranteed that the keys aren't "accidentally" leaked to someone else. There are many IM clients out there boasting end-to-end encryption but are closed source - which means they're not to be trusted. At all.

Big flashing warning: don't ever use the TG client from google playstore, it contains code that allows Google to block channels and messages. Perhaps more. That being said, don't use Gboard or any closed source keyboard for that matter, as EVERYTHING you type is collected and uploaded.
End-to-end encryption is not a panacea. First of all, default chats in TG are cloud chats which do not use this type of encryption. You need to organize particular secret chats in order to use end-to-end encryption, and this function is available only in mobile versions of the client, not in the desktop version. Second, message exchange goes through TG servers in any case.

Moreover, end-to-end encryption in TG has a major flaw. The thing is, random seeds needed to generate encryption keys are not generated on user devices, these are requested from the server instead. Since the server code is closed, we do not know how strong is random generation algorythm used in TG and whether those random seeds are logged somewhere or not.

Also, your TG account is always bound to your phone number, which is not good privacy-wise.

Re: Social media

Reply #21
For the time being it's an almost acceptable solution for non-sensitive, casual group communication, allowing for very large (200K) groups - end-to-end encryption can be used but only in secret chats and voice/video calls. For more serious stuff, Wire (also open-source client) is the way to go. For critical stuff, Tox is flirting with the top.
Stop beating the bush.

Re: Social media

Reply #22
Can you make matrix bridge with telegram group?
Create problems which don't have solution



Re: Social media

Reply #25
its in Arch's community repo. if you wanted it.   telegram-desktop.  

Re: Social media

Reply #26
You need to organize particular secret chats in order to use end-to-end encryption, and this function is available only in mobile versions of the client, not in the desktop version. Second, message exchange goes through TG servers in any case.

Moreover, end-to-end encryption in TG has a major flaw. The thing is, random seeds needed to generate encryption keys are not generated on user devices, these are requested from the server instead. Since the server code is closed, we do not know how strong is random generation algorythm used in TG and whether those random seeds are logged somewhere or not.
All this makes TG claims about opensource and unbreakable end-to-end encryption just a snake oil salesmen trick.
Why don't use end-to-end encryption by default and hide this option in menu?
Because in reality vast majority of users conversations are not end-to-end encrypted and available on the server.
If someone points to this developer can always say: well it is because users are holding your phone wrong way.

Some alternatives:
movim – xmpp protocol for messenger with social media layer
session – signal-like protocol, hides metadata through tor-like network

Basically, in order for Artix (or any enetity, not just the devs for a linux distro) to expand their userbase and become more well known, they unfortunately need to play ball with the duopoly that Facebook and Twitter have on social networking - because the majority of people just aren't going to stop using either of them
There are already distros addressing today’s majority.
Facebook and twitter deleted from the list and firefox not as default browser and available only in later repos looked very encouraging for me because of consistent approach of the team.

Re: Social media

Reply #27
Is there an Artix Mastodon yet?


Re: Social media

Reply #29
Twitter and FB outlets are unmaintained and undesirable due to heavy tracking and censorship. The most active by far is our Telegram group.


waht is a telegram group?


A Telegram group is a centralized group chat that requires you give them your phone number to participate in it, which is anti-privacy. You can read more about Telegram here, https://spyware.neocities.org/articles/telegram