Skip to main content ↑ ↓
Topic: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd (Read 4014 times) previous topic - next topic
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd

Reply #15 –
Quote from: Shoun2137 – on
... and without being ever updated to whatever the fuck GNOMIES what it to be...
More like "whatever the jackoffs paying Gnome rodents to be whatever they want it to be."

Re: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd

Reply #16 –
Oh, no! What are we ever gonna do without the Wayland compositor that adamantly refuses to implement the Wayand protocols that people want?

Re: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd

Reply #17 –
Quote from: mrbrklyn – on
Quote from: dpx – on

Fedora Workstation has a long history of developing and promoting the Wayland experience


What the fuck is that.... does the damn mouse work?  Cut and Paste?  Keyboard?

We have been using the "Wayland Experience" since xerox Park...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLV4_xaYynY

I am sick of the marketing crap being poured onto the Linux ecosystem to justify the unexceptionable.




I am personally using KDE + Wayland + dinit and it works much better than X did at any point since the mid-2000s when I started using it. So yes.

Also, screw GNOME. Who needs them anyway? I spun up a virtualbox Arch install to see what it looks like and god DAMN they actually made it worse.

- The new text editor is worse than Windows 95 notepad.exe
- The new terminal looks like something I could code in 5 hours. "professional quality software" from IBM/RedHat

Re: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd

Reply #18 –
In my eyes GNOME as a project is both hostile and unpredictable to the point where it wouldn't be unjust for forward thinking distributions to just outright remove the desktop proper and refuse to package it. I mean how irrational would it be to Just Say No when upstream are a bunch of pedantic children who don't listen to any real feedback?
 

Re: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd

Reply #19 –
Quote from: K0rpZ0uth – on
In my eyes GNOME as a project is both hostile and unpredictable to the point where it wouldn't be unjust for forward thinking distributions to just outright remove the desktop proper and refuse to package it. I mean how irrational would it be to Just Say No when upstream are a bunch of pedantic children who don't listen to any real feedback?
You forgot the part where GNOME developers are the same people that work on various mainstream distro as packagers. It's not easy to cut the parasite off when it's host was already replaced by parasite.

Re: GNOME to Increase Dependence on systemd

Reply #20 –
Quote from: Shoun2137 – on
You forgot the part where GNOME developers are the same people that work on various mainstream distro as packagers. It's not easy to cut the parasite off when it's host was already replaced by parasite.
Wait, you mean the exact same thing that happened with systemd remove-trailing-space-commit-"developers"?